Comments on: JL subwoofer excursion test

By: Reaper87xx

Reaper87xx — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:56:18 +0000

Power Supply’s bass …
Power Supply’s bass test, nothing better!

By: skulliwulli

skulliwulli — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:56:18 +0000

The smartest part …
The smartest part of you must have run down your mother’s leg. First, as I’ve said before, a big pane of mirror would distort with 3 subs going and you would never be able to see the image. Second, it’s not a trunk size issue it’s a trunk opening issue. one big box wouldn’t have been able to fit the the opening. You are the reason pigs eat their young.

By: Savage813

Savage813 — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:56:18 +0000

thats the worst …
thats the worst argument i ever heard the subwoofer box is just flipped around, and putting it into 1peice makes it harder to fit in the trunk of a normal car if its split in 2 its much easier…

By: Bamchucknorris

Bamchucknorris — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:56:18 +0000

AHA!!! I know its a …
AHA!!! I know its a mirror because at 0:21 you can see that the jl logo is upside down in the second row which is the reverse-image mirror effect!!! Its really 3 subs. Besides, a 6 sub box would not take more room that two triple sub enclosures packed together, i would take less because it would be all one piece!!!

By: Thoumsssss

Thoumsssss — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:56:18 +0000

hhyyyeeaaaaaaahhh!!!
hhyyyeeaaaaaaahhh!!!

By: Monkeypumper420

Monkeypumper420 — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:56:18 +0000

I alway’s loved …
I alway’s loved those old school JL’s… Nice!

By: jamin1203912

jamin1203912 — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:56:18 +0000

Its like an army of …
Its like an army of subs!! I have that JL audio sub but only one of them

Great subs though keep it up!

By: phattacorider

phattacorider — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:56:18 +0000

144db on this setup …
144db on this setup? Nice! What frequency?

By: jlaudiosubs1

jlaudiosubs1 — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:56:18 +0000

tight
tight

By: pintolisman

pintolisman — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:56:18 +0000

gotta love the jl’s
gotta love the jl’s