<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: jl audio w7 is it what it says it is?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jlsubwoofer.com/jl-w7/jl-audio-w7-is-it-what-it-says-it-is/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jlsubwoofer.com/jl-w7/jl-audio-w7-is-it-what-it-says-it-is</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 07:35:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Craiger</title>
		<link>http://www.jlsubwoofer.com/jl-w7/jl-audio-w7-is-it-what-it-says-it-is/comment-page-1#comment-1489</link>
		<dc:creator>Craiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 05:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jlsubwoofer.com/jl-w7/jl-audio-w7-is-it-what-it-says-it-is#comment-1489</guid>
		<description>My friend had a W7 in his mazda suv thingy....and I hated it.

He had the 1000/1 amp going it, with like $500 worth of wiring, and it still sounded shitty. I agree with everyone here so far....get the kicker square subs (it&#039;s what I&#039;ve got...and you can&#039;t beat them)&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My friend had a W7 in his mazda suv thingy&#8230;.and I hated it.</p>
<p>He had the 1000/1 amp going it, with like $500 worth of wiring, and it still sounded shitty. I agree with everyone here so far&#8230;.get the kicker square subs (it&#8217;s what I&#8217;ve got&#8230;and you can&#8217;t beat them)<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david c</title>
		<link>http://www.jlsubwoofer.com/jl-w7/jl-audio-w7-is-it-what-it-says-it-is/comment-page-1#comment-1488</link>
		<dc:creator>david c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 05:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jlsubwoofer.com/jl-w7/jl-audio-w7-is-it-what-it-says-it-is#comment-1488</guid>
		<description>mounts with speaker holes within the foam surround and a ring to hold its surround in place
imo, no not worth the money. ive only heard it once. it preformed very good, pulls out alot of bass for one subwoofer, but not my taste&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;my guess</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mounts with speaker holes within the foam surround and a ring to hold its surround in place<br />
imo, no not worth the money. ive only heard it once. it preformed very good, pulls out alot of bass for one subwoofer, but not my taste<br /><b>References : </b><br />my guess</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jvenom25</title>
		<link>http://www.jlsubwoofer.com/jl-w7/jl-audio-w7-is-it-what-it-says-it-is/comment-page-1#comment-1487</link>
		<dc:creator>jvenom25</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 04:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jlsubwoofer.com/jl-w7/jl-audio-w7-is-it-what-it-says-it-is#comment-1487</guid>
		<description>IMO i think they are overpriced for what they are, they are SQL subs i&#039;d go with a kicker l7 for what its worth put it in right enclosure and you&#039;ll be louder than what it but the l7 will be loud and low bass SPL while the w7 will be sq less bang than l7 i&#039;d say, but if you&#039;ve heard them then its up to you really&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMO i think they are overpriced for what they are, they are SQL subs i&#8217;d go with a kicker l7 for what its worth put it in right enclosure and you&#8217;ll be louder than what it but the l7 will be loud and low bass SPL while the w7 will be sq less bang than l7 i&#8217;d say, but if you&#8217;ve heard them then its up to you really<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
