Comments on: What is the best sub out of these three: JL Audio w7, Fi BTL, or RE xxx? http://www.jlsubwoofer.com/jl-w7/what-is-the-best-sub-out-of-these-three-jl-audio-w7-fi-btl-or-re-xxx Fri, 30 Apr 2010 07:35:22 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: moofa http://www.jlsubwoofer.com/jl-w7/what-is-the-best-sub-out-of-these-three-jl-audio-w7-fi-btl-or-re-xxx/comment-page-1#comment-1864 moofa Thu, 16 Jul 2009 02:35:59 +0000 http://www.jlsubwoofer.com/jl-w7/what-is-the-best-sub-out-of-these-three-jl-audio-w7-fi-btl-or-re-xxx#comment-1864 Well, you have 2 Sq subs listed and a SPL sub in the middle. The RE XXX is a heavy sub. It is actually a heavy POS. They are very inefficient, have horible motor noise, and just cost too much. They are far from a great sub. when Scott owned RE, it was a great sub. Noe it has been changed and horrible. The JL W7 is a better quality sub than the XXX, but you are again talking about a pure SQ sub. Anythin above 45hz these subs lack and lack hard. They would be ALOT better off sticking these in a home theater application. The Fi BTL is a good sub, but SQ isn't great. Sounds ok, but still doesn't pick up the lows like I would like. If you want real help, shoot me an email and I can help you out. lowhz01@yahoo.com IM me if you would like as well.<br><b>References : </b><br> Well, you have 2 Sq subs listed and a SPL sub in the middle.

The RE XXX is a heavy sub. It is actually a heavy POS. They are very inefficient, have horible motor noise, and just cost too much. They are far from a great sub. when Scott owned RE, it was a great sub. Noe it has been changed and horrible.

The JL W7 is a better quality sub than the XXX, but you are again talking about a pure SQ sub. Anythin above 45hz these subs lack and lack hard. They would be ALOT better off sticking these in a home theater application.

The Fi BTL is a good sub, but SQ isn’t great. Sounds ok, but still doesn’t pick up the lows like I would like.

If you want real help, shoot me an email and I can help you out.

lowhz01@yahoo.com

IM me if you would like as well.
References :

]]> By: mxcrazy123 http://www.jlsubwoofer.com/jl-w7/what-is-the-best-sub-out-of-these-three-jl-audio-w7-fi-btl-or-re-xxx/comment-page-1#comment-1863 mxcrazy123 Thu, 16 Jul 2009 02:19:59 +0000 http://www.jlsubwoofer.com/jl-w7/what-is-the-best-sub-out-of-these-three-jl-audio-w7-fi-btl-or-re-xxx#comment-1863 The RE XXX without a doubt. The FI could be louder maybe. But, the XXX is like King of subs. They weigh 78 lbs each. JL W7 might yield the best sq but wont be near as loud as those other 2. The RE and FI both rms at 2000 watts if I'm right and the JL W7 rms at 1000. So twice as much power is needed for those two subs. If it were me I would go with the W7 because I am more of an SQ guy. Also you save tons on amplifiers, big three, caps, alternator, battery. Hope this helped.<br><b>References : </b><br> The RE XXX without a doubt. The FI could be louder maybe. But, the XXX is like King of subs. They weigh 78 lbs each. JL W7 might yield the best sq but wont be near as loud as those other 2. The RE and FI both rms at 2000 watts if I’m right and the JL W7 rms at 1000. So twice as much power is needed for those two subs. If it were me I would go with the W7 because I am more of an SQ guy. Also you save tons on amplifiers, big three, caps, alternator, battery.
Hope this helped.
References :

]]>